PortfoliosLab logo
L vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between L and COST is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

L vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loews Corporation (L) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

L:

0.66

COST:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

L:

0.98

COST:

1.96

Omega Ratio

L:

1.14

COST:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

L:

1.15

COST:

1.81

Martin Ratio

L:

3.86

COST:

5.32

Ulcer Index

L:

3.62%

COST:

5.89%

Daily Std Dev

L:

21.47%

COST:

21.91%

Max Drawdown

L:

-65.58%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

L:

-4.01%

COST:

-6.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

L:

$18.54B

COST:

$447.27B

EPS

L:

$6.10

COST:

$17.14

PE Ratio

L:

14.49

COST:

58.82

PEG Ratio

L:

2.69

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

L:

1.04

COST:

1.69

PB Ratio

L:

1.08

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

L:

$13.07B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

L:

$11.18B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

L:

$951.00M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.29% return. Over the past 10 years, L has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 8.58%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.83% annualized return.


L

YTD

4.46%

1M

4.39%

6M

6.52%

1Y

13.72%

5Y*

25.12%

10Y*

8.58%

COST

YTD

10.29%

1M

4.77%

6M

7.07%

1Y

28.72%

5Y*

29.27%

10Y*

23.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

L vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of L is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of L is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of L is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of L is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of L is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of L is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

L vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loews Corporation (L) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current L Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

L vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
L
Loews Corporation
0.29%0.30%0.36%0.43%0.44%0.56%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.54%0.66%0.60%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

L vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

L vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Loews Corporation (L) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) have volatilities of 6.14% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

L vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loews Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
3.63B
63.72B
(L) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items