PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

L vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loews Corporation (L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with L having a 10.75% return and SPY slightly lower at 10.45%. Over the past 10 years, L has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.52%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.


L

1D
1.31%
1M
7.75%
6M
11.59%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
28.91%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
11.52%

SPY

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.26%
6M
8.34%
YTD
10.45%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
L
Loews Corporation
10.75%24.68%22.09%19.78%1.41%28.89%-13.69%15.89%-8.56%8.56%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.45%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between L and SPY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 1993

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between L and SPY has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L
L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loews Corporation (L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.43

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

10.57

-1.40

L vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

L vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-55.19%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.99%

-8.88%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

-18.76%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-24.50%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.53%

-33.72%

-14.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.12%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-9.02%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.03%

+1.13%

Volatility

L vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Loews Corporation (L) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.26%. This indicates that L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.26%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

10.01%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

12.60%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

17.17%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

17.93%

+7.67%

Dividends

L vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than SPY's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
L
Loews Corporation
0.21%0.24%0.30%0.36%0.43%0.43%0.56%0.48%0.55%1.58%0.53%0.65%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


L and SPY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

L has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SPY (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, L dropped -65.58% vs SPY's -55.19%.

L currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer