KINS vs. EUDA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KINS (Kingstone Companies, Inc.) and EUDA (EUDA Health Holdings Limited) are both stocks. KINS operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while EUDA operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, KINS returned 121.61%/yr vs -16.65%/yr for EUDA. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

KINS vs. EUDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a -10.07% return, which is significantly higher than EUDA's -63.66% return.

KINS

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -7.15%
• YTD: -10.07%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: -5.01%
• 3Y*: 121.61%
• 5Y*: 14.65%
• 10Y*: 7.18%

EUDA

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: -63.66%
• 6M: -72.92%
• 1Y: -77.06%
• 3Y*: -16.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KINS vs. EUDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-10.07%	11.54%	613.15%	57.78%	-72.27%	5.05%
EUDA EUDA Health Holdings Limited	-63.66%	-48.38%	212.94%	-13.21%	-83.10%	1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and EUDA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	-0.02

Fundamentals

EPS KINS : -$399.22 EUDA : $0.14
PS Ratio KINS : 0.00 EUDA : 6.04
Total Revenue (TTM) KINS : $59.92B EUDA : $5.16M
Gross Profit (TTM) KINS : $100.92M EUDA : $1.16M
EBITDA (TTM) KINS : -$6.57B EUDA : -$1.99M

Return for Risk

KINS vs. EUDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 32
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 29

EUDA

EUDA Risk / Return Rank: 20
EUDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EUDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EUDA Omega Ratio Rank: 29
EUDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
EUDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KINS vs. EUDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KINS	EUDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	-0.43	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	0.01	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.00	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	-0.83	+0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	-1.36	+0.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KINS vs. EUDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the EUDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and EUDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KINS	EUDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	-0.43	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.33	+0.40

Drawdowns

KINS vs. EUDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, roughly equal to the maximum EUDA drawdown of -97.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and EUDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	KINS	EUDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.97%	-97.39%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.22%	-93.24%	+69.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.84%	-95.65%	+56.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.69%	-91.66%	+61.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.31%	-61.17%	+11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.85%	56.65%	-45.80%

Volatility

KINS vs. EUDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) is 16.08%, while EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) has a volatility of 31.92%. This indicates that KINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KINS	EUDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.08%	31.92%	-15.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.68%	148.91%	-120.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.76%	178.29%	-138.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.67%	128.04%	-55.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.34%	128.04%	-68.70%

Dividends

KINS vs. EUDA - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while EUDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUDA EUDA Health Holdings Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.33%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KINS and EUDA in my portfolio?

KINS and EUDA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KINS or EUDA?

EUDA has higher volatility (31.92%) compared to KINS (16.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KINS dropped -96.97% vs EUDA's -97.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.