PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KINS vs. EUDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KINS vs. EUDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than EUDA's -58.23% return.


KINS

1D
-1.29%
1M
-0.75%
6M
30.07%
YTD
19.41%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
160.75%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
10.58%
ALL TIME*
6.72%

EUDA

1D
-1.30%
1M
39.05%
6M
-22.80%
YTD
-58.23%
1Y
-69.51%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-39.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.01K$61.34K$183.21K
$2.11M$2.26M$2.31M

KINS vs. EUDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
19.41%11.54%613.15%57.78%-72.27%5.50%
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Limited
-58.23%-48.38%212.94%-13.21%-83.10%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and EUDA is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KINS:

$289.26M

EUDA:

$36.04M

Total Revenue (TTM)

KINS:

$59.92B

EUDA:

$5.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KINS:

$100.92M

EUDA:

$1.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

KINS:

-$6.57B

EUDA:

-$1.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kingstone Companies, Inc.

EUDA Health Holdings Limited

Return for Risk

KINS vs. EUDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KINS
KINS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

EUDA
EUDA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EUDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KINS vs. EUDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KINSEUDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.05

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

-0.74

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

-1.07

+3.23

KINS vs. EUDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the EUDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and EUDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KINS vs. EUDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, roughly equal to the maximum EUDA drawdown of -97.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and EUDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KINSEUDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.97%

-97.39%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.22%

-93.24%

+69.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.84%

-95.65%

+56.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.64%

-90.42%

+83.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.08%

-62.23%

+13.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.24%

64.18%

-52.94%

Volatility

KINS vs. EUDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) is 9.93%, while EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) has a volatility of 44.21%. This indicates that KINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KINSEUDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.93%

44.21%

-34.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.17%

120.94%

-90.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.18%

183.59%

-143.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.81%

127.75%

-54.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.49%

127.75%

-68.26%

Dividends

KINS vs. EUDA - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while EUDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
1.00%0.59%0.00%0.00%8.89%3.20%2.74%4.19%2.26%1.61%1.82%2.36%

Financials

KINS vs. EUDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and EUDA Health Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KINS and EUDA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUDA has higher volatility (44.21%) compared to KINS (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KINS dropped -96.97% vs EUDA's -97.39%.

KINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KINS and EUDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer