KIE vs. CNA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KIE (SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Insurance Select Industry Index, while CNA (CNA Financial Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, KIE returned 10.60%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for CNA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

KIE vs. CNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and CNA Financial Corporation (CNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIE achieves a -7.88% return, which is significantly lower than CNA's -5.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KIE having a 10.60% annualized return and CNA not far behind at 10.45%.

KIE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: -7.88%
• 6M: -5.75%
• 1Y: -6.09%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

CNA

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -11.10%
• YTD: -5.87%
• 6M: -2.79%
• 1Y: -5.19%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 10.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KIE vs. CNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance ETF	-7.88%	8.12%	26.95%	12.18%	3.48%	22.75%	-3.04%	27.19%	-5.99%	12.83%
CNA CNA Financial Corporation	-5.87%	6.96%	23.96%	7.14%	3.82%	19.07%	-5.42%	9.47%	-11.12%	36.94%

Correlation

The correlation between KIE and CNA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005	0.75

The correlation between KIE and CNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KIE vs. CNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KIE

KIE Risk / Return Rank: 5
KIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KIE Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KIE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CNA

CNA Risk / Return Rank: 27
CNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CNA Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CNA Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KIE vs. CNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and CNA Financial Corporation (CNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KIE	CNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	-0.27	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.42	-0.24	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.97	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	-0.30	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	-0.66	-0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KIE vs. CNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIE Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the CNA Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIE and CNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KIE	CNA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38	-0.27	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.25	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.42	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.15	+0.14

Drawdowns

KIE vs. CNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, smaller than the maximum CNA drawdown of -87.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIE and CNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	KIE	CNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.30%	-87.48%	+12.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-14.55%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.65%	-14.55%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.68%	-25.67%	+9.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.31%	-45.91%	+1.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-13.86%	+4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-25.55%	+13.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	6.53%	-1.77%

Volatility

KIE vs. CNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) is 4.41%, while CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that KIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KIE	CNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	9.82%	-5.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.06%	14.98%	-3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.04%	19.26%	-3.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	21.43%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	24.94%	-3.77%

Dividends

KIE vs. CNA - Dividend Comparison

KIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than CNA's 9.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNA CNA Financial Corporation	9.19%	8.04%	7.77%	6.81%	8.51%	5.15%	8.93%	7.59%	7.47%	5.84%	7.23%	8.53%
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance ETF	1.68%	1.57%	1.48%	1.45%	1.90%	1.95%	1.85%	1.76%	1.83%	1.56%	1.55%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KIE and CNA in my portfolio?

KIE and CNA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KIE or CNA?

CNA has higher volatility (9.82%) compared to KIE (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIE dropped -75.30% vs CNA's -87.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.