PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHC vs. HAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KHC vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHC achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, KHC has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -7.58%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher 0.88% annualized return.


KHC

1D
0.70%
1M
7.13%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.27%
1Y
-1.64%
3Y*
-7.94%
5Y*
-6.37%
10Y*
-7.58%

HAL

1D
-0.40%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
41.41%
6M
39.63%
1Y
84.34%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHC vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Company
4.12%-16.31%-12.96%-5.04%18.18%7.98%13.78%-21.20%-42.25%-8.37%
HAL
Halliburton Company
41.41%7.02%-23.19%-6.47%74.45%21.99%-21.23%-4.90%-44.63%-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between KHC and HAL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2015

0.20

The correlation between KHC and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KHC:

$28.98B

HAL:

$33.22B

EPS

KHC:

-$4.85

HAL:

$1.82

PS Ratio

KHC:

1.16

HAL:

1.51

PB Ratio

KHC:

0.69

HAL:

3.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

KHC:

$24.99B

HAL:

$22.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KHC:

$8.46B

HAL:

$3.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

KHC:

-$3.86B

HAL:

$3.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHC vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHC
KHC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
KHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHC vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KHCHALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.36

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

6.47

-6.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

16.47

-16.60

KHC vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHC and HAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KHC vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHC drawdown since its inception was -76.07%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHC and HAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHCHALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.07%

-92.99%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.19%

-13.10%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.72%

-54.01%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.69%

-54.01%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.07%

-91.45%

+15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.61%

-32.89%

-27.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-39.12%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.88%

5.14%

+7.74%

Volatility

KHC vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) is 7.37%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that KHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHCHALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

9.32%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.74%

24.13%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.54%

36.76%

-11.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.43%

40.18%

-17.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.09%

45.96%

-18.87%

Dividends

KHC vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

KHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than HAL's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAL
Halliburton Company
1.72%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Company
6.56%6.60%5.21%4.33%3.93%4.46%4.62%4.98%5.81%3.15%2.69%25.01%

Financials

KHC vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kraft Heinz Company and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
6.05B
5.40B
(KHC) Total Revenue
(HAL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KHC vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kraft Heinz Company and Halliburton Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
36.7%
14.6%
Portfolio components
KHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kraft Heinz Company reported a gross profit of 2.22B and revenue of 6.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.

KHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kraft Heinz Company reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 6.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.9%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

KHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kraft Heinz Company reported a net income of 798.00M and revenue of 6.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KHC and HAL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to KHC (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KHC dropped -76.07% vs HAL's -92.99%.

HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHC and HAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer