PortfoliosLab logo
KHC vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KHC and ET is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

KHC vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-40.44%
17.93%
KHC
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KHC:

-0.95

ET:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

KHC:

-1.26

ET:

0.88

Omega Ratio

KHC:

0.85

ET:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

KHC:

-0.38

ET:

0.58

Martin Ratio

KHC:

-1.95

ET:

2.03

Ulcer Index

KHC:

11.38%

ET:

6.99%

Daily Std Dev

KHC:

22.57%

ET:

26.14%

Max Drawdown

KHC:

-76.07%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

KHC:

-57.29%

ET:

-19.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KHC:

$34.45B

ET:

$56.72B

EPS

KHC:

$2.19

ET:

$1.28

PE Ratio

KHC:

13.18

ET:

12.91

PEG Ratio

KHC:

0.99

ET:

0.77

PS Ratio

KHC:

1.33

ET:

0.72

PB Ratio

KHC:

0.70

ET:

1.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

KHC:

$25.43B

ET:

$61.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KHC:

$8.79B

ET:

$10.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

KHC:

$2.43B

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHC achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -13.53% return.


KHC

YTD

-5.53%

1M

-4.95%

6M

-12.28%

1Y

-18.13%

5Y*

4.05%

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-13.53%

1M

-11.94%

6M

5.05%

1Y

13.80%

5Y*

27.41%

10Y*

1.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KHC vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KHC is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KHC is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KHC is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KHC is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KHC is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KHC is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KHC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KHC, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
KHC: -0.95
ET: 0.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for KHC, currently valued at -1.26, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
KHC: -1.26
ET: 0.88
The chart of Omega ratio for KHC, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
KHC: 0.85
ET: 1.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for KHC, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
KHC: -0.38
ET: 0.58
The chart of Martin ratio for KHC, currently valued at -1.95, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
KHC: -1.95
ET: 2.03

The current KHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHC and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.95
0.54
KHC
ET

Dividends

KHC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

KHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than ET's 7.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Company
5.59%5.21%4.33%3.93%4.46%4.62%4.98%5.81%3.15%2.69%2.34%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.71%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

KHC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHC drawdown since its inception was -76.07%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHC and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-57.29%
-19.64%
KHC
ET

Volatility

KHC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) is 10.29%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 16.44%. This indicates that KHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.29%
16.44%
KHC
ET

Financials

KHC vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kraft Heinz Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
6.00B
19.54B
(KHC) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KHC vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kraft Heinz Company and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20212022202320242025
34.4%
21.0%
(KHC) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
KHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Kraft Heinz Company reported a gross profit of 2.06B and revenue of 6.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.10B and revenue of 19.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
KHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Kraft Heinz Company reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.28B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
KHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Kraft Heinz Company reported a net income of 712.00M and revenue of 6.00B, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.