KHC vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KHC or ET.
Key characteristics
KHC | ET | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 0.43% | 16.92% |
1Y Return | -4.55% | 36.96% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -0.19% | 32.62% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.34% | 10.36% |
10Y Return (Ann) | -0.25% | 3.86% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.14 | 2.46 |
Daily Std Dev | 18.60% | 14.91% |
Max Drawdown | -76.08% | -87.81% |
Current Drawdown | -47.83% | -5.94% |
Fundamentals
KHC | ET | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $46.39B | $53.75B |
EPS | $2.31 | $1.09 |
PE Ratio | 16.52 | 14.64 |
PEG Ratio | 1.02 | 0.58 |
Revenue (TTM) | $26.64B | $78.59B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $8.24B | $13.42B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $6.37B | $12.69B |
Correlation
The correlation between KHC and ET is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KHC vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KHC achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 16.92% return. Over the past 10 years, KHC has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -0.25%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 3.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KHC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KHC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
KHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than ET's 7.89% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Kraft Heinz Company | 4.36% | 4.33% | 3.93% | 4.46% | 4.62% | 4.98% | 5.81% | 3.15% | 2.69% | 3.09% | 3.43% | 3.80% |
Energy Transfer LP | 7.89% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
KHC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KHC drawdown since its inception was -76.08%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHC and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KHC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.98%. This indicates that KHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KHC vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kraft Heinz Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities