PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGRN vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KGRN vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 15.39% return.


KGRN

1D
-0.84%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-2.21%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
-7.84%
10Y*

DRGN

1D
-1.00%
1M
4.18%
YTD
15.39%
6M
15.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGRN vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KGRN and DRGN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGRN vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGRN
KGRN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
KGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGRN vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KGRNDRGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

KGRN vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KGRNDRGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

1.52

-1.45

Drawdowns

KGRN vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGRNDRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.24%

-20.86%

-45.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.62%

-7.97%

-39.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-7.93%

-26.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.13%

Volatility

KGRN vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGRNDRGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.05%

34.79%

-11.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.75%

34.79%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.86%

34.79%

-1.93%

KGRN vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

KGRN vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than DRGN's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRGN
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
1.05%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
0.85%0.85%1.49%0.74%1.98%0.41%0.01%5.88%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


KGRN and DRGN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.

DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.

KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.39% for DRGN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGRN and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer