KGRN vs. DRGN
KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGRN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
KGRN vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 15.39% return.
KGRN
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KGRN vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.04% | -2.11% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 15.39% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGRN and DRGN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGRN vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
KGRN
DRGN
KGRN vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGRN | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGRN | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.52 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGRN | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.24% | -20.86% | -45.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.62% | -7.97% | -39.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -7.93% | -26.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | — | — |
Volatility
KGRN vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGRN | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.05% | 34.79% | -11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.75% | 34.79% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 34.79% | -1.93% |
KGRN vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGRN vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than DRGN's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.05% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGRN and DRGN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.
DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.
KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for KGRN and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer