KGLD vs. SCHG
KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. KGLD is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
KGLD vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.78% return.
KGLD
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
KGLD vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 3.87% | 29.75% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.78% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGLD and SCHG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGLD vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
KGLD
SCHG
KGLD vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGLD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.85 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
KGLD vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGLD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -34.59% | +14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.71% | -1.44% | -17.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -5.20% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.90% | — |
Volatility
KGLD vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGLD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.67% | 15.49% | +13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 22.26% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 21.55% | +7.12% |
KGLD vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGLD vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.53%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 12.53% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGLD and SCHG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.53%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
KGLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for KGLD and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer