KGLD vs. GLD
KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. KGLD is actively managed, while GLD is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
KGLD vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a -8.09% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -7.67% return.
KGLD
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -8.09%
- 6M
- -11.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- -7.67%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
KGLD vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | -8.09% | 29.75% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -7.67% | 28.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGLD and GLD is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGLD vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
KGLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLD
KGLD vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGLD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGLD vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGLD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -45.56% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.07% | -26.21% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -16.17% | +9.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.24% | — |
Volatility
KGLD vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGLD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.14% | 27.75% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 18.30% | +10.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 16.07% | +13.07% |
KGLD vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGLD vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.16%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 14.16% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, KGLD and GLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 14.16%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
KGLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.40% for GLD.
Find the right allocation for KGLD and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer