PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. SEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGC vs. SEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than SEI's 61.67% return.


KGC

1D
2.90%
1M
-18.08%
YTD
-8.92%
6M
-8.14%
1Y
65.63%
3Y*
76.13%
5Y*
29.09%
10Y*
18.81%

SEI

1D
-2.67%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
61.67%
6M
61.32%
1Y
167.96%
3Y*
112.03%
5Y*
53.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGC vs. SEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-8.92%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%46.30%-25.00%5.37%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
61.67%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%75.35%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and SEI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGC:

$30.80B

SEI:

$3.66B

EPS

KGC:

$2.35

SEI:

$1.03

PE Ratio

KGC:

10.87

SEI:

72.19

PS Ratio

KGC:

3.92

SEI:

4.83

PB Ratio

KGC:

3.37

SEI:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGC:

$7.94B

SEI:

$692.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGC:

$4.19B

SEI:

$235.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

KGC:

$5.02B

SEI:

$249.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. SEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGC vs. SEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGCSEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

6.39

-4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

16.09

-10.89

KGC vs. SEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and SEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGC vs. SEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than SEI's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and SEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCSEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-79.49%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.69%

-26.43%

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.69%

-55.37%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.29%

-55.37%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.63%

-5.65%

-26.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-38.61%

-18.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

10.48%

+2.18%

Volatility

KGC vs. SEI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is 18.21%, while Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a volatility of 21.30%. This indicates that KGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCSEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.21%

21.30%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.59%

53.09%

-12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.35%

73.22%

-21.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.22%

66.77%

-22.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.01%

62.28%

-15.27%

Dividends

KGC vs. SEI - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SEI's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.57%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%0.00%0.00%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.65%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

KGC vs. SEI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.37B
196.24M
(KGC) Total Revenue
(SEI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KGC vs. SEI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.8%
37.1%
Portfolio components
KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGC and SEI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to KGC (18.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs SEI's -79.49%.

SEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and SEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer