PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. LYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGC vs. LYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -15.90% return, which is significantly lower than LYG's 12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has outperformed LYG with an annualized return of 17.28%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.93% annualized return.


KGC

1D
-0.67%
1M
-21.74%
YTD
-15.90%
6M
-17.22%
1Y
51.96%
3Y*
72.58%
5Y*
32.37%
10Y*
17.28%

LYG

1D
1.39%
1M
6.58%
YTD
12.70%
6M
12.06%
1Y
42.68%
3Y*
45.28%
5Y*
23.43%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGC vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-15.90%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%46.30%-25.00%38.91%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
12.70%103.71%20.30%14.68%-9.47%33.81%-40.79%36.81%-28.35%30.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and LYG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001

0.15

Over the past year, KGC and LYG have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

KGC:

$2.36

LYG:

£0.50

PE Ratio

KGC:

10.00

LYG:

8.74

PEG Ratio

KGC:

0.13

LYG:

4.37

PS Ratio

KGC:

3.60

LYG:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGC:

$7.94B

LYG:

£65.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGC:

$4.19B

LYG:

£65.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

KGC:

$5.02B

LYG:

£7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LYG
LYG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGC vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGCLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.89

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

5.08

-1.47

KGC vs. LYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the LYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and LYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGC vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and LYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-94.84%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.79%

-22.72%

-15.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.79%

-22.72%

-15.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.22%

-40.19%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

-68.72%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.79%

-53.42%

+15.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.57%

-63.39%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.43%

8.43%

+6.00%

Volatility

KGC vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) at 9.09%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.09%

9.09%

+8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.55%

22.84%

+18.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.94%

28.74%

+23.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.26%

32.17%

+12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.98%

35.07%

+11.91%

Dividends

KGC vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than LYG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.61%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.42%3.19%5.44%5.23%4.92%2.70%0.00%5.04%6.63%6.81%5.17%2.11%

Financials

KGC vs. LYG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.37B
5.18B
(KGC) Total Revenue
(LYG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KGC values in USD, LYG values in GBP

KGC vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
57.8%
100.0%
Portfolio components
KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGC and LYG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGC has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to LYG (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs LYG's -94.84%.

LYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and LYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer