PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEX vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEX vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kirby Corporation (KEX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEX achieves a 28.26% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 23.05% return.


KEX

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
28.26%
6M
26.72%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
17.53%
10Y*
8.50%

ZIM

1D
3.82%
1M
0.12%
YTD
23.05%
6M
31.40%
1Y
61.18%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEX vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KEX
Kirby Corporation
28.26%4.14%34.81%21.96%8.30%16.44%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
23.05%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%

Correlation

The correlation between KEX and ZIM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.24

Fundamentals

EPS

KEX:

$6.37

ZIM:

$0.81

PE Ratio

KEX:

22.18

ZIM:

31.10

PEG Ratio

KEX:

0.68

ZIM:

0.18

PS Ratio

KEX:

2.34

ZIM:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEX:

$3.36B

ZIM:

$6.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEX:

$883.42M

ZIM:

$676.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

KEX:

$781.87M

ZIM:

$1.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEX vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEX
KEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
KEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
KEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEX vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kirby Corporation (KEX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEXZIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.06

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

5.18

-3.33

KEX vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEX and ZIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEX vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEX drawdown since its inception was -75.42%, smaller than the maximum ZIM drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEX and ZIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEXZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.42%

-84.68%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.83%

-29.84%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.76%

-57.12%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.76%

-84.68%

+45.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.39%

-11.49%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-39.77%

+11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.07%

11.85%

+2.22%

Volatility

KEX vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kirby Corporation (KEX) is 5.78%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that KEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEXZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

11.94%

-6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

36.70%

-19.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.04%

52.54%

-17.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.91%

65.74%

-33.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.94%

67.49%

-31.55%

Dividends

KEX vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

KEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KEX
Kirby Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
4.95%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%

Financials

KEX vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kirby Corporation and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
851.78M
1.40B
(KEX) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KEX vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kirby Corporation and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
26.2%
3.4%
Portfolio components
KEX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kirby Corporation reported a gross profit of 223.49M and revenue of 851.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.

KEX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kirby Corporation reported an operating income of 127.89M and revenue of 851.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

KEX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kirby Corporation reported a net income of 91.81M and revenue of 851.78M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KEX and ZIM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZIM has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to KEX (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEX dropped -75.42% vs ZIM's -84.68%.

ZIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEX and ZIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer