KEN vs. WDC
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) and WDC (Western Digital Corporation) are both stocks. KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while WDC operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 10 years, KEN returned 41.88%/yr vs 33.87%/yr for WDC. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KEN vs. WDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than WDC's 227.01% return. Over the past 10 years, KEN has outperformed WDC with an annualized return of 41.88%, while WDC has yielded a comparatively lower 33.87% annualized return.
KEN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -20.01%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 6M
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 57.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.84%
- 10Y*
- 41.88%
WDC
- 1D
- 6.35%
- 1M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 227.01%
- 6M
- 219.46%
- 1Y
- 911.92%
- 3Y*
- 164.18%
- 5Y*
- 58.50%
- 10Y*
- 33.87%
KEN vs. WDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 14.26% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 23.06% | 85.88% |
WDC Western Digital Corporation | 227.01% | 283.68% | 13.86% | 65.99% | -51.62% | 17.73% | -10.89% | 77.14% | -51.90% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and WDC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2015 | 0.18 |
The correlation between KEN and WDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KEN:
$1.54
WDC:
$23.29
KEN:
46.98
WDC:
24.17
KEN:
7.89
WDC:
0.56
KEN:
3.80
WDC:
13.31
KEN:
$1.01B
WDC:
$11.78B
KEN:
$166.82M
WDC:
$5.35B
KEN:
$339.95M
WDC:
$10.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. WDC — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
WDC
KEN vs. WDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Western Digital Corporation (WDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEN | WDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.95 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 44.74 | -40.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 151.81 | -134.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEN vs. WDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, smaller than the maximum WDC drawdown of -96.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and WDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | WDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -96.20% | +27.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.41% | -20.59% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | -49.65% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | -59.68% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | -70.49% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.16% | -5.22% | -18.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.19% | -52.07% | +28.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.74% | 6.06% | +0.68% |
Volatility
KEN vs. WDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) is 14.84%, while Western Digital Corporation (WDC) has a volatility of 21.76%. This indicates that KEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | WDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.84% | 21.76% | -6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.71% | 53.55% | -22.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.55% | 65.47% | -25.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 48.86% | -9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.93% | 48.62% | -6.69% |
Dividends
KEN vs. WDC - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than WDC's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.31% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
WDC Western Digital Corporation | 0.09% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.81% | 2.36% | 5.41% | 2.51% | 2.94% | 3.33% |
Financials
KEN vs. WDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Western Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEN vs. WDC - Profitability Comparison
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
WDC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 3.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
WDC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
WDC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported a net income of 3.21B and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in a net margin of 96.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and WDC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDC has higher volatility (21.76%) compared to KEN (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs WDC's -96.20%.
WDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.07 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and WDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer