KEN vs. TDVI
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while TDVI (FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust. Over the past year, KEN returned 125.86% vs 49.89% for TDVI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KEN vs. TDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 25.41% return, which is significantly lower than TDVI's 28.41% return.
KEN
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -16.76%
- YTD
- 25.41%
- 6M
- 36.06%
- 1Y
- 125.86%
- 3Y*
- 64.62%
- 5Y*
- 34.95%
- 10Y*
- 42.65%
TDVI
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 12.36%
- YTD
- 28.41%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 49.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEN vs. TDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 25.41% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -4.10% |
TDVI FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF | 28.41% | 24.75% | 22.84% | 10.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and TDVI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2023 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. TDVI — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
TDVI
KEN vs. TDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEN | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.55 | 5.10 | +2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.03 | 16.15 | +5.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEN | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | 2.83 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
KEN vs. TDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than TDVI's maximum drawdown of -22.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and TDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -22.08% | -47.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -9.83% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.76% | -3.09% | -13.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.19% | -2.98% | -20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | 3.10% | +2.64% |
Volatility
KEN vs. TDVI - Volatility Comparison
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 14.76% compared to FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI) at 6.85%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.76% | 6.85% | +7.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.43% | 13.32% | +16.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.62% | 17.71% | +20.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.69% | 19.66% | +20.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.86% | 19.66% | +22.20% |
Dividends
KEN vs. TDVI - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than TDVI's 6.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 4.84% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
TDVI FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF | 6.50% | 7.53% | 7.90% | 3.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and TDVI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (14.76%) compared to TDVI (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs TDVI's -22.08%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and TDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer