KEN vs. FSLR

In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly higher than FSLR's -9.35% return. Over the past 10 years, KEN has outperformed FSLR with an annualized return of 27.19%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.58% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current KEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the FSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEN and FSLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, while FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -66.48%, smaller than the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and FSLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) is 8.29%, while First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that KEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.