PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVI vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDVI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVI achieves a 32.51% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.63% return.


TDVI

1D
1.75%
1M
17.59%
YTD
32.51%
6M
31.82%
1Y
57.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
0.38%
1M
6.99%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.39%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDVI
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF
32.51%24.75%18.42%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.63%18.62%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVI and QQQI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.82

The correlation between TDVI and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDVI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVI
TDVI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVIQQQIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.29

2.44

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.28

3.21

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.45

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.98

3.34

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.03

15.01

+4.02

TDVI vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVI Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVI and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVIQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

2.44

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.72

1.34

+0.37

Drawdowns

TDVI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVI drawdown since its inception was -22.08%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVI and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.08%

-20.00%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-9.61%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-2.20%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.14%

+0.95%

Volatility

TDVI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.67%. This indicates that TDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

2.67%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

9.85%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

12.98%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.63%

17.08%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

17.08%

+2.55%

TDVI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDVI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

TDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than QQQI's 13.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.17%13.82%12.85%0.00%
TDVI
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF
6.30%7.53%7.90%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDVI and QQQI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDVI has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to QQQI (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVI dropped -22.08% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, TDVI leads with 57.59% vs 31.46% for QQQI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDVI has performed better with a 57.59% return vs 31.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TDVI.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.17%, compared with 6.30% for TDVI.

TDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TDVI and 0.68% for QQQI.

TDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDVI and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer