KEMX vs. KEMQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMX returned 14.09%/yr vs -2.19%/yr for KEMQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.

Performance

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 44.15% return, which is significantly higher than KEMQ's 10.08% return.

KEMX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 14.75%
• YTD: 44.15%
• 6M: 50.30%
• 1Y: 82.49%
• 3Y*: 30.23%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: —

KEMQ

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: 10.26%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 25.61%
• 5Y*: -2.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	44.15%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	10.08%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and KEMQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019	0.72

The correlation between KEMX and KEMQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KEMX	KEMQ
Technology	41.2%	45.0%
Financial Services	20.7%	-
Industrials	8.6%	-
Basic Materials	8.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	33.0%
Energy	4.8%	-
Communication Services	3.2%	15.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	0.4%
Utilities	2.0%	-
Healthcare	1.7%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

KEMX vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 92
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 41
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEMX	KEMQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.71	1.58	+2.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.43	2.18	+2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.28	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	1.99	+3.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.72	5.33	+16.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the KEMQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and KEMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEMX	KEMQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71	1.58	+2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	-0.07	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.07	+0.62

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and KEMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMX	KEMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.80%	-70.72%	+31.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.36%	-21.94%	+6.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	-21.94%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	-66.02%	+35.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-26.06%	+26.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-35.69%	+26.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	8.19%	-4.34%

Volatility

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) have volatilities of 9.67% and 9.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMX	KEMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.67%	9.53%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.84%	20.67%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.34%	26.04%	-3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	31.86%	-13.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	29.58%	-8.64%

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMX vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than KEMQ's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	4.78%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.28%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMX and KEMQ in my portfolio?

KEMX and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEMX or KEMQ?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to KEMQ (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.

Which ETF is better, KEMX or KEMQ?

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 14.09% vs -2.19% for KEMQ. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KEMQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMX or KEMQ?

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 14.09% return vs -2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMX or KEMQ?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMX or KEMQ?

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.28% for KEMX.

What is the main difference between KEMX and KEMQ?

KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KEMQ is Emerging Markets Equities. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.