KEMX vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
KEMX and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both KEMX and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KEMX vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KEMX vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 9.35% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | -2.07% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 41.62% | -1.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than KBA's -2.07% return.
KEMX
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
KBA
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KEMX vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
KBA
KEMX vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMX | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 1.63 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 2.20 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 2.54 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.60 | 10.01 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMX | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.63 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.19 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.31 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and KBA is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KEMX vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than KBA's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 3.00% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.60% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and KBA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -53.24% | +14.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -11.30% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -40.42% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.68% | -5.08% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -26.15% | +17.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.01% | +0.66% |
Volatility
KEMX vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) at 5.63%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 5.63% | +6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.96% | 11.80% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 18.64% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 27.07% | -9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 25.28% | -4.67% |