KEMQ vs. TJUN
KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.
KEMQ
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 6.99% | 19.40% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and TJUN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMQ vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
KEMQ
TJUN
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 2.48 | -2.42 |
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.72% | -4.47% | -66.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.14% | -0.00% | -28.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.69% | -0.60% | -35.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | — | — |
Volatility
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.14% | 7.54% | +18.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 7.54% | +24.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 7.54% | +22.04% |
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMQ vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 4.92% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMQ and TJUN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KEMQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KEMQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: CICC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for KEMQ and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer