TJUN vs. VNAM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) and VNAM (Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while VNAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. Over the past year, TJUN returned 18.22% vs 51.15% for VNAM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TJUN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for VNAM.

Performance

TJUN vs. VNAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUN achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than VNAM's 0.99% return.

TJUN

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 18.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VNAM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 2.48%
• 1Y: 51.15%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUN vs. VNAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	5.75%	11.79%
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF	0.99%	49.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUN and VNAM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

TJUN vs. VNAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VNAM

VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 56
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUN vs. VNAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TJUN	VNAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.02	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.44	—

Drawdowns

TJUN vs. VNAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUN drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum VNAM drawdown of -52.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUN and VNAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUN	VNAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-52.84%	+48.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.47%	-17.03%	+12.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.86%	+5.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-30.28%	+29.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TJUN	VNAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.35%	27.15%	-19.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.35%	25.57%	-18.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.35%	25.57%	-18.22%

TJUN vs. VNAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VNAM's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUN vs. VNAM - Dividend Comparison

TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF	0.49%	0.50%	1.00%	0.49%	1.04%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUN and VNAM in my portfolio?

TJUN and VNAM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TJUN or VNAM?

On 1-year performance, VNAM leads with 51.15% vs 18.22% for TJUN. On fees, VNAM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUN or VNAM?

Over the 1-year period, VNAM has performed better with a 51.15% return vs 18.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUN or VNAM?

VNAM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUN or VNAM?

VNAM has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

What is the main difference between TJUN and VNAM?

TJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VNAM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TJUN and 0.51% for VNAM.