TJUN vs. VNAM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) and VNAM (Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), while VNAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TJUN returned 8.16% vs 19.62% for VNAM. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TJUN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for VNAM.

Performance

TJUN vs. VNAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUN achieves a -1.24% return, which is significantly higher than VNAM's -5.90% return.

TJUN

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: -3.34%
• YTD: -1.24%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.39%

VNAM

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -6.30%
• 6M: -5.05%
• YTD: -5.90%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	$28.96K	$85.30K	$113.88K
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF	$359.89K	$250.04K	$295.38K

TJUN vs. VNAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	-1.24%	11.79%
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF	-5.90%	49.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUN and VNAM is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

TJUN vs. VNAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TJUN

TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 31
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 35

VNAM

VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 30
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TJUN vs. VNAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TJUN	VNAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.70	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	1.17	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.14	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	1.10	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.49	2.66	+0.83

TJUN vs. VNAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUN Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the VNAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUN and VNAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TJUN vs. VNAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUN drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, smaller than the maximum VNAM drawdown of -52.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUN and VNAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUN	VNAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-52.84%	+43.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-17.17%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-12.28%	+5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-29.80%	+28.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	7.06%	-4.85%

Volatility

TJUN vs. VNAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is 6.70%, while Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that TJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUN	VNAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.70%	8.11%	-1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	19.84%	-10.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	27.05%	-16.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.42%	25.56%	-15.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.42%	25.56%	-15.14%

TJUN vs. VNAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VNAM's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUN vs. VNAM - Dividend Comparison

TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNAM Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF	0.51%	0.50%	1.00%	0.49%	1.04%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUN and VNAM in my portfolio?

TJUN and VNAM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUN or VNAM?

VNAM has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to TJUN (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUN dropped -9.77% vs VNAM's -52.84%.

Which ETF is better, TJUN or VNAM?

On 1-year performance, VNAM leads with 19.62% vs 8.16% for TJUN. On fees, VNAM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUN or VNAM?

Over the 1-year period, VNAM has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUN or VNAM?

VNAM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUN or VNAM?

VNAM has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

What is the main difference between TJUN and VNAM?

TJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VNAM is Emerging Markets Equities. TJUN tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), while VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TJUN and 0.51% for VNAM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.