PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMQ vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHE's 11.88% return.


KEMQ

1D
-2.81%
1M
7.12%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.35%
1Y
36.95%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*

SCHE

1D
-1.45%
1M
2.69%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.88%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
6.99%56.28%13.81%0.77%-38.09%-27.31%39.26%28.26%-25.52%1.88%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
11.88%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and SCHE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.88

The correlation between KEMQ and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KEMQ
SCHE

Technology

45.0%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

33.0%
8.9%

Communication Services

15.5%
5.2%

Healthcare

3.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

13.6%

Industrials

-

4.9%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

KEMQ
45.0%
SCHE
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

KEMQ
33.0%
SCHE
8.9%

Communication Services

KEMQ
15.5%
SCHE
5.2%

Healthcare

KEMQ
3.5%
SCHE
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

KEMQ
0.4%
SCHE
2.0%

Basic Materials

KEMQ

-

SCHE
3.9%

Energy

KEMQ

-

SCHE
3.1%

Financial Services

KEMQ

-

SCHE
13.6%

Industrials

KEMQ

-

SCHE
4.9%

Real Estate

KEMQ

-

SCHE
1.0%

Utilities

KEMQ

-

SCHE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ
KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMQSCHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.72

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

9.82

-5.30

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and SCHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMQSCHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.89

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.28

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.25

-0.19

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and SCHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMQSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.72%

-36.20%

-34.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-11.29%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-17.08%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-33.59%

-32.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.14%

-1.45%

-26.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.69%

-12.60%

-23.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

3.12%

+5.08%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 5.80%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMQSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

5.80%

+4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

13.58%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.14%

16.26%

+9.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.88%

17.67%

+14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

19.46%

+10.12%

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

KEMQ vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than SCHE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
4.92%5.27%0.73%0.29%0.00%0.28%2.28%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.57%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMQ and SCHE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMQ has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to SCHE (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs SCHE's -36.20%.

On 5-year performance, SCHE leads with 4.94% vs -2.87% for KEMQ. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHE has performed better with a 4.94% return vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 2.57% for SCHE.

KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while SCHE tracks FTSE All-World Emerging. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.11% for SCHE.

SCHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMQ and SCHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer