KEMQ vs. KMLM
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM).
KEMQ and KMLM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMQ is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2017. KMLM is an actively managed fund by CICC. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020.
Performance
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | -8.14% | 56.28% | 13.81% | 0.77% | -38.09% | -27.31% | 7.40% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 8.67% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 8.67% return.
KEMQ
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -10.71%
- YTD
- -8.14%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- -6.00%
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 8.60%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KEMQ vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
KEMQ
KMLM
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.88 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.27 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 3.31 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.88 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.39 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.49 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and KMLM is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than KMLM's 4.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 5.73% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.62% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and KMLM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.72% | -27.47% | -43.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.94% | -6.73% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.39% | -27.47% | -38.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.30% | -15.27% | -23.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.75% | -12.73% | -23.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 2.41% | +4.21% |
Volatility
KEMQ vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.05%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KEMQ | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.98% | 4.05% | +7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.65% | 7.22% | +12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 9.84% | +17.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 14.57% | +17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.54% | 14.67% | +14.87% |