PortfoliosLab logo
KMLM vs. CMDY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and CMDY is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: -0.1

Performance

KMLM vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.56%
52.66%
KMLM
CMDY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KMLM:

-1.33

CMDY:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

KMLM:

-1.78

CMDY:

0.62

Omega Ratio

KMLM:

0.80

CMDY:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

KMLM:

-0.49

CMDY:

0.20

Martin Ratio

KMLM:

-1.58

CMDY:

1.02

Ulcer Index

KMLM:

9.07%

CMDY:

4.89%

Daily Std Dev

KMLM:

10.82%

CMDY:

13.13%

Max Drawdown

KMLM:

-29.10%

CMDY:

-31.20%

Current Drawdown

KMLM:

-29.10%

CMDY:

-15.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 5.28% return.


KMLM

YTD

-7.26%

1M

-4.89%

6M

-5.86%

1Y

-15.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CMDY

YTD

5.28%

1M

-2.79%

6M

4.42%

1Y

4.88%

5Y*

13.15%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KMLM vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for KMLM: current value is 0.90%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KMLM: 0.90%
Expense ratio chart for CMDY: current value is 0.28%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CMDY: 0.28%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMLM vs. CMDY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMLM is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMLM is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMLM is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMDY is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMDY is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMDY is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMDY is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMDY is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMDY is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KMLM vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KMLM, currently valued at -1.33, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
KMLM: -1.33
CMDY: 0.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for KMLM, currently valued at -1.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
KMLM: -1.78
CMDY: 0.62
The chart of Omega ratio for KMLM, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
KMLM: 0.80
CMDY: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for KMLM, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
KMLM: -0.49
CMDY: 0.20
The chart of Martin ratio for KMLM, currently valued at -1.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
KMLM: -1.58
CMDY: 1.02

The current KMLM Sharpe Ratio is -1.33, which is lower than the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLM and CMDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.33
0.38
KMLM
CMDY

Dividends

KMLM vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than CMDY's 4.01% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
0.88%0.82%0.00%8.12%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
4.01%4.23%5.09%3.98%16.09%0.14%2.21%1.73%

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and CMDY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-29.10%
-15.66%
KMLM
CMDY

Volatility

KMLM vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is 2.46%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that KMLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.46%
7.27%
KMLM
CMDY