KDVD vs. PWC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. KDVD is actively managed, while PWC is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KDVD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.

Performance

KDVD vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDVD achieves a 16.11% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 8.45% return.

KDVD

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 2.58%
• 6M: 9.47%
• YTD: 16.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWC

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: 3.27%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 1Y: 11.71%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: 9.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDVD vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF	16.11%	-0.07%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	8.45%	-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KDVD and PWC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

KDVD vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDVD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PWC

PWC Risk / Return Rank: 41
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDVD vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KDVD	PWC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.44	—

Drawdowns

KDVD vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDVD drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDVD and PWC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KDVD	PWC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-78.13%	+67.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-36.03%	+33.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KDVD	PWC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.58%	9.78%	+4.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.58%	15.98%	-1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.58%	18.72%	-4.14%

KDVD vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDVD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KDVD vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

KDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than PWC's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF	1.31%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	1.75%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KDVD and PWC in my portfolio?

KDVD and PWC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KDVD or PWC?

On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KDVD or PWC?

KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KDVD or PWC?

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.31% for KDVD.

What is the main difference between KDVD and PWC?

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for KDVD and 0.60% for PWC.