KDVD vs. GGTL
KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KDVD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GGTL is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KDVD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGTL.
Performance
KDVD vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KDVD having a 17.18% return and GGTL slightly lower at 17.10%.
KDVD
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GGTL
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- YTD
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $245.95K | $123.28K | $50.77K | |
| $12.62K | $8.99K | $7.70K |
KDVD vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 17.18% | -0.07% |
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 17.10% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDVD and GGTL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDVD vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank
KDVD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GGTL
KDVD vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KDVD | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KDVD vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDVD drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum GGTL drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDVD and GGTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDVD | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -23.65% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -9.83% | +9.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -7.41% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility
KDVD vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDVD | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 22.49% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 18.85% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 18.85% | -4.46% |
KDVD vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDVD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDVD vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison
KDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than GGTL's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 0.89% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.78% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 1.30% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDVD and GGTL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.
KDVD has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.89% for GGTL.
KDVD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GGTL is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for KDVD and 0.90% for GGTL.
Find the right allocation for KDVD and GGTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer