KDEF vs. GLTR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the The Korea Defence Industry Index, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KDEF returned 23.84% vs 38.86% for GLTR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.

Performance

KDEF vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return.

KDEF

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -9.85%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 6M: 13.24%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLTR

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -9.08%
• YTD: -4.66%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 38.86%
• 3Y*: 29.97%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEF vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	10.00%	116.28%
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	-4.66%	71.78%

Correlation

The correlation between KDEF and GLTR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

KDEF vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF

KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 21
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 22
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 22

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 30
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEF vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KDEF	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.04	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	1.39	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.22	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	1.17	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.48	2.88	-0.40

KDEF vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEF and GLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KDEF vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KDEF	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.55%	-55.70%	+20.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.55%	-34.09%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.83%	-31.27%	+4.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.96%	-28.82%	+21.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.09%	13.86%	-2.77%

Volatility

KDEF vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 18.52% compared to abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 10.43%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KDEF	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.52%	10.43%	+8.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.55%	36.24%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.43%	38.40%	+8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.55%	23.87%	+23.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.55%	20.64%	+26.91%

KDEF vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KDEF vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	6.25%	5.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KDEF and GLTR in my portfolio?

KDEF and GLTR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KDEF or GLTR?

KDEF has higher volatility (18.52%) compared to GLTR (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -35.55% vs GLTR's -55.70%.

Which ETF is better, KDEF or GLTR?

On 1-year performance, GLTR leads with 38.86% vs 23.84% for KDEF. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KDEF or GLTR?

Over the 1-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 38.86% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KDEF or GLTR?

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KDEF or GLTR?

KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between KDEF and GLTR?

KDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while GLTR is Precious Metals. KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.60% for GLTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.