PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCE vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCE vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, KCE has outperformed VFH with an annualized return of 16.37%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively lower 12.20% annualized return.


KCE

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
16.37%

VFH

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCE vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
-1.07%10.76%37.51%32.04%-22.14%40.05%30.82%27.13%-15.63%32.01%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-6.40%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and VFH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.88

The correlation between KCE and VFH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KCE vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KCE
VFH

Financial Services

98.5%
96.8%

Technology

1.5%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KCE
98.5%
VFH
96.8%

Technology

KCE
1.5%
VFH
2.1%

Basic Materials

KCE

-

VFH

-

Communication Services

KCE

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KCE

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

KCE

-

VFH

-

Energy

KCE

-

VFH

-

Healthcare

KCE

-

VFH
0.1%

Industrials

KCE

-

VFH
0.2%

Real Estate

KCE

-

VFH
0.8%

Utilities

KCE

-

VFH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCE vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCE vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCEVFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.04

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.16

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

0.43

+1.22

KCE vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCEVFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.16

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.41

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.54

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.24

+0.01

Drawdowns

KCE vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCEVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.00%

-78.61%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-14.75%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-17.30%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-25.66%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-44.42%

+3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-9.24%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.81%

-18.54%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

5.55%

+1.08%

Volatility

KCE vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 3.34%. This indicates that KCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCEVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.34%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

11.10%

+3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

14.79%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

19.31%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

22.54%

+0.56%

KCE vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCE vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VFH's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.75%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.56%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCE and VFH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCE has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to VFH (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs VFH's -78.61%.

On 10-year performance, KCE leads with 16.37% vs 12.20% for VFH. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KCE has performed better with a 16.37% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.

KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.

KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.10% for VFH.

KCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCE and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer