PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCE vs. XLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCE vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, KCE has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 17.91%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.69% annualized return.


KCE

1D
0.03%
1M
4.36%
6M
3.69%
YTD
7.80%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
17.91%
ALL TIME*
7.64%

XLF

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.37%
6M
7.47%
YTD
4.86%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
13.69%
ALL TIME*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.68M$2.28M$2.42M
$1.84B$1.93B$1.92B

KCE vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
7.80%10.76%37.51%32.04%-22.14%40.05%30.82%27.13%-15.63%32.01%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
4.86%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and XLF is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.86

The correlation between KCE and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

KCE vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KCE
XLF

Financial Services

97.2%
98.2%

Technology

2.8%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KCE
97.2%
XLF
98.2%

Technology

KCE
2.8%
XLF
1.6%

Basic Materials

KCE

-

XLF

-

Communication Services

KCE

-

XLF

-

Consumer Cyclical

KCE

-

XLF

-

Consumer Defensive

KCE

-

XLF

-

Energy

KCE

-

XLF

-

Healthcare

KCE

-

XLF

-

Industrials

KCE

-

XLF
0.2%

Real Estate

KCE

-

XLF

-

Utilities

KCE

-

XLF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCE vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KCE vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCEXLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.13

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.71

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

1.80

-0.86

KCE vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCE vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and XLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCEXLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.00%

-82.69%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-14.79%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-15.54%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-25.81%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-42.86%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.15%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-19.92%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

5.79%

+1.05%

Volatility

KCE vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.07%. This indicates that KCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCEXLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.07%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

11.10%

+4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.72%

14.77%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.13%

18.45%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

22.08%

+0.80%

KCE vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCE vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.67%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.42%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCE and XLF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCE has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to XLF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs XLF's -82.69%.

On 10-year performance, KCE leads with 17.91% vs 13.69% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KCE has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 13.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.

KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.42% for XLF.

KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.08% for XLF.

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCE and XLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer