PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KBWP vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KBWP vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBWP is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWP returned 12.39%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for XLG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBWP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

KBWP vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 12.39%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.94% annualized return.

KBWP

1D
2.46%
1M
2.63%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.38%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
12.39%

XLG

1D
-1.88%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
1.60%
6M
0.73%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
16.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		-1.94%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF		1.60%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and XLG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2010

0.38

The correlation between KBWP and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWP vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
KBWP
XLG

Financial Services

100.0%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Communication Services

-

16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.2%

Energy

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

7.0%

Industrials

-

1.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

46.8%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWP
100.0%
XLG
9.0%

Basic Materials

KBWP

-

XLG
0.6%

Communication Services

KBWP

-

XLG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWP

-

XLG
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

KBWP

-

XLG
5.2%

Energy

KBWP

-

XLG
2.4%

Healthcare

KBWP

-

XLG
7.0%

Industrials

KBWP

-

XLG
1.9%

Real Estate

KBWP

-

XLG

-

Technology

KBWP

-

XLG
46.8%

Utilities

KBWP

-

XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Often compared with KBWP:
KBWP vs. IAKKBWP vs. KIEKBWP vs. KBEKBWP vs. ACGLKBWP vs. PSCFKBWP vs. TRVKBWP vs. VOO
Often compared with XLG:
XLG vs. SPYXLG vs. QQQXLG vs. VOOXLG vs. XLKXLG vs. TOPTXLG vs. MGKXLG vs. SPYG

Return for Risk

KBWP vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

KBWPXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.15
1.44

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.32
1.98

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.26

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.61

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

5.77

-5.21

KBWP vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and XLG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KBWPXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-52.39%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-12.41%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-20.70%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-28.02%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-30.46%

-9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-6.91%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-7.63%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

3.46%

+0.90%

Volatility

KBWP vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.04%. This indicates that KBWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KBWPXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.04%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

10.74%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

13.98%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

18.79%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

18.88%

+1.85%

KBWP vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBWP vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than XLG's 0.66% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		2.00%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF		0.66%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

KBWP and XLG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWP has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to XLG (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.94% vs 12.39% for KBWP. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.94% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWP.

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.

KBWP is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.20% for XLG.

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWP and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer