KBWP vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBWP is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWP returned 11.32%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for XLG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBWP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

KBWP vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 11.32%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.

KBWP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -8.05%
• 6M: -4.56%
• 1Y: -6.56%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

XLG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 8.82%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 30.80%
• 3Y*: 24.94%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	-8.05%	11.49%	30.45%	7.09%	10.16%	20.61%	-2.05%	28.67%	-2.76%	8.86%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.82%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and XLG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2010	0.39

The correlation between KBWP and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWP vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBWP	XLG
Financial Services	100.0%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	2.7%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	43.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBWP vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWP

KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 4
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 62
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBWP	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	2.33	-2.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	3.14	-3.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.41	-0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	2.55	-3.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	9.60	-10.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBWP vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBWP	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	2.33	-2.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.90	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.93	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.63	+0.07

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBWP	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-52.39%	+12.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-12.41%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-20.70%	+8.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.00%	-28.02%	+11.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.76%	-30.46%	-9.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.81%	-0.29%	-8.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-7.64%	+3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	3.30%	+1.48%

Volatility

KBWP vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 2.92%. This indicates that KBWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBWP	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	2.92%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	9.73%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	13.28%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.52%	18.68%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	18.84%	+1.86%

KBWP vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBWP vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than XLG's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	2.02%	1.58%	1.64%	1.68%	1.99%	3.02%	1.93%	1.99%	2.11%	1.90%	2.14%	1.35%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.59%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBWP and XLG in my portfolio?

KBWP and XLG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBWP or XLG?

KBWP has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to XLG (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, KBWP or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.41% vs 11.32% for KBWP. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBWP or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBWP or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBWP or XLG?

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.59% for XLG.

What is the main difference between KBWP and XLG?

KBWP is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.