KBWP vs. ACGL

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than ACGL's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed ACGL with an annualized return of 13.03%, while ACGL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.99% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the ACGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and ACGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than ACGL's 5.43% yield.

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum ACGL drawdown of -54.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and ACGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) is 11.42%, while Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that KBWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.