PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWP vs. IAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWP vs. IAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly lower than IAK's 10.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KBWP having a 12.93% annualized return and IAK not far ahead at 13.45%.


KBWP

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.93%
6M
10.54%
YTD
7.40%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.93%
ALL TIME*
13.72%

IAK

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.06%
6M
12.67%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
13.45%
ALL TIME*
7.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.76M$20.90M$11.89M
$2.91M$3.13M$2.04M

KBWP vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
7.40%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
10.07%9.50%28.25%11.28%11.33%26.84%-2.86%25.94%-11.48%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and IAK is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2010

0.80

The correlation between KBWP and IAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWP vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWP
IAK

Financial Services

100.0%
99.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.7%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWP
100.0%
IAK
99.3%

Basic Materials

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Communication Services

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Energy

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Healthcare

KBWP

-

IAK
0.7%

Industrials

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Real Estate

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Technology

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Utilities

KBWP

-

IAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWP vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBWP vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWPIAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.45

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

5.96

-1.81

KBWP vs. IAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the IAK Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and IAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and IAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWPIAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-77.38%

+37.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-7.62%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-11.58%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-14.76%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-44.95%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-3.23%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-16.01%

+11.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

3.13%

+1.07%

Volatility

KBWP vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 7.03%. This indicates that KBWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWPIAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

7.03%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

12.43%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

16.00%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

18.13%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

20.92%

-0.07%

KBWP vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWP vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than IAK's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.43%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
1.82%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, KBWP and IAK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KBWP has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to IAK (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs IAK's -77.38%.

On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 13.45% vs 12.93% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 7.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IAK.

IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.82% for KBWP.

KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.38% for IAK.

IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWP and IAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer