PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWD vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWD vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWD has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 4.82%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.20% annualized return.


KBWD

1D
-2.44%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
-5.52%
6M
-6.05%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
4.82%

VFH

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWD vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-5.52%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-6.40%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWD and VFH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2010

0.77

The correlation between KBWD and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWD vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWD
VFH

Financial Services

60.9%
96.8%

Real Estate

39.1%
0.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Technology

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWD
60.9%
VFH
96.8%

Real Estate

KBWD
39.1%
VFH
0.8%

Basic Materials

KBWD

-

VFH

-

Communication Services

KBWD

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWD

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

KBWD

-

VFH

-

Energy

KBWD

-

VFH

-

Healthcare

KBWD

-

VFH
0.1%

Industrials

KBWD

-

VFH
0.2%

Technology

KBWD

-

VFH
2.1%

Utilities

KBWD

-

VFH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWD vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWD vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWDVFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.16

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

0.43

+0.01

KBWD vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is comparable to the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWD and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWDVFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.16

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.41

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.54

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.24

+0.03

Drawdowns

KBWD vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWDVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-78.61%

+19.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-14.75%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.65%

-17.30%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-25.66%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-44.42%

-14.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-9.24%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-18.54%

+11.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

5.55%

+0.25%

Volatility

KBWD vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 3.34%. This indicates that KBWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWDVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.34%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

11.10%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

14.79%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

19.31%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

22.54%

+0.70%

KBWD vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWD has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWD vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.40%, more than VFH's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.40%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.56%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWD and VFH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to VFH (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs VFH's -78.61%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.20% vs 4.82% for KBWD. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.40%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.

KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for KBWD and 0.10% for VFH.

KBWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWD and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer