KBWD vs. VFH
KBWD (Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KBWD tracks the KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWD returned 4.82%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for VFH. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWD charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VFH.
Performance
KBWD vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWD has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 4.82%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.20% annualized return.
KBWD
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -6.05%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
VFH
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
KBWD vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | -5.52% | 5.59% | 4.30% | 20.21% | -19.14% | 31.89% | -15.58% | 20.72% | -8.70% | 12.06% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -6.40% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWD and VFH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2010 | 0.77 |
The correlation between KBWD and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KBWD vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBWD
VFH
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBWD
VFH
Real Estate
KBWD
VFH
Basic Materials
KBWD
-
VFH
-
Communication Services
KBWD
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
KBWD
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
KBWD
-
VFH
-
Energy
KBWD
-
VFH
-
Healthcare
KBWD
-
VFH
Industrials
KBWD
-
VFH
Technology
KBWD
-
VFH
Utilities
KBWD
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWD vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
KBWD
VFH
KBWD vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBWD | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.16 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBWD | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.16 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.41 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.54 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.24 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
KBWD vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWD | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -78.61% | +19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -14.75% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -17.30% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -25.66% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -44.42% | -14.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.23% | -9.24% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -18.54% | +11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 5.55% | +0.25% |
Volatility
KBWD vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 3.34%. This indicates that KBWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWD | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.34% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 11.10% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 14.79% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 19.31% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 22.54% | +0.70% |
KBWD vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWD has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWD vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.40%, more than VFH's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | 14.40% | 12.83% | 12.45% | 11.45% | 11.32% | 7.26% | 9.68% | 8.63% | 9.47% | 8.77% | 8.68% | 8.89% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.56% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWD and VFH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWD has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to VFH (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.20% vs 4.82% for KBWD. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for KBWD.
KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.40%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.
KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for KBWD and 0.10% for VFH.
KBWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWD and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer