PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWB vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 13.42%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


KBWB

1D
1.70%
1M
9.79%
YTD
10.56%
6M
10.32%
1Y
44.54%
3Y*
33.36%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
13.42%

XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
10.56%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and XLE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWB and XLE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWB vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWB
XLE

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWB
100.0%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Energy

KBWB

-

XLE
100.0%

Healthcare

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Industrials

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Technology

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Utilities

KBWB

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWB vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWBXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.10

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

8.63

-0.62

KBWB vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWBXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-71.26%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-12.05%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-20.14%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

-26.04%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-66.81%

+16.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.01%

+8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-17.97%

+6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

4.32%

+0.88%

Volatility

KBWB vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) is 5.85%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that KBWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWBXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

7.26%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

16.79%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.41%

20.57%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.67%

26.05%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.21%

29.58%

-0.37%

KBWB vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWB vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
1.94%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWB and XLE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to KBWB (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 13.42% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, KBWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWB.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.94% for KBWB.

KBWB is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.08% for XLE.

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWB and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer