KBWB vs. TRUF
KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KBWB is passively managed, while TRUF is actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KBWB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
KBWB vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KBWB
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 36.87%
- 3Y*
- 31.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.87%
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $147.63M | $184.17M | $155.76M | |
| $20.82K | $18.81K | $11.26K |
KBWB vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 20.49% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 16.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWB and TRUF is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWB vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
KBWB
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBWB vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBWB | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBWB vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWB | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -3.24% | -47.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -1.04% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -1.05% | -10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | — | — |
Volatility
KBWB vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWB | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.60% | 13.53% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 13.53% | +12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 13.53% | +15.53% |
KBWB vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWB vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.46% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.62% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWB and TRUF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWB.
KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for KBWB and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer