PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 13.69%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.


KBWB

1D
0.20%
1M
1.73%
6M
12.74%
YTD
15.29%
1Y
36.87%
3Y*
31.95%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
13.69%
ALL TIME*
13.87%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$147.63M$184.17M$155.76M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

KBWB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
15.29%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and SCHD is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWB and SCHD has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWB vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWB
SCHD

Financial Services

100.0%
9.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

20.6%

Energy

-

14.1%

Healthcare

-

20.8%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.7%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

KBWB
100.0%
SCHD
9.9%

Basic Materials

KBWB

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

KBWB

-

SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWB

-

SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

KBWB

-

SCHD
20.6%

Energy

KBWB

-

SCHD
14.1%

Healthcare

KBWB

-

SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

KBWB

-

SCHD
7.8%

Real Estate

KBWB

-

SCHD

-

Technology

KBWB

-

SCHD
12.7%

Utilities

KBWB

-

SCHD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBWB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWBSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.51

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

6.74

-4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

17.01

-10.50

KBWB vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWBSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-33.37%

-16.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-4.61%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-16.13%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

-16.85%

-32.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-33.37%

-16.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.24%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-3.30%

-8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

1.82%

+3.36%

Volatility

KBWB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWBSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

4.11%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

8.11%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

11.13%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.39%

14.39%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

16.72%

+12.34%

KBWB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
1.93%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWB has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 13.69% vs 12.76% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWB.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.93% for KBWB.

KBWB is categorized as Financials Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWB and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer