PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. KBWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWB vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 12.25%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.


KBWB

1D
1.74%
1M
1.83%
YTD
5.53%
6M
12.68%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
12.25%

KBWP

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-8.05%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
-6.56%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
5.53%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
-8.05%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and KBWP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWB and KBWP has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWB vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWB
KBWP

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWB
100.0%
KBWP
100.0%

Basic Materials

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Communication Services

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Energy

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Healthcare

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Industrials

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Real Estate

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Technology

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Utilities

KBWB

-

KBWP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWB vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWBKBWPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

-0.41

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

-0.45

+2.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.95

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

-0.60

+2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.29

-1.19

+8.48

KBWB vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWBKBWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

-0.41

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.55

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.55

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.69

-0.19

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and KBWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWBKBWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-39.76%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-9.41%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-12.29%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

-17.00%

-32.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-39.76%

-10.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-8.81%

+6.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-4.36%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

4.78%

+0.42%

Volatility

KBWB vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) at 4.10%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWBKBWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.10%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

11.41%

+4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

16.21%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

18.52%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

20.70%

+8.50%

KBWB vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KBWB and KBWP have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

KBWB vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, which matches KBWP's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
2.03%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
2.02%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWB and KBWP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWB has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to KBWP (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 12.25% vs 11.32% for KBWP. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, KBWP has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWB and KBWP have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

KBWB and KBWP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.03%.

KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR).

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWB and KBWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer