KBWB vs. IAK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KBWB tracks the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index while IAK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWB returned 14.07%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for IAK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.

Performance

KBWB vs. IAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed IAK with an annualized return of 14.07%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.

KBWB

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 9.33%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 40.49%
• 3Y*: 37.07%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

IAK

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: 13.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	12.95%	32.05%	36.73%	-1.18%	-21.68%	37.72%	-10.46%	35.90%	-18.30%	18.11%
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF	3.62%	9.50%	28.25%	11.28%	11.33%	26.84%	-2.86%	25.94%	-11.48%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and IAK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWB and IAK has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWB vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBWB	IAK
Financial Services	100.0%	99.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.6%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBWB vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB

KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 56
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

IAK

IAK Risk / Return Rank: 16
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 14
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBWB	IAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.42	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	0.69	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.08	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	0.84	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	1.87	+5.94

KBWB vs. IAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the IAK Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and IAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and IAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBWB	IAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-77.38%	+27.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.38%	-7.62%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-11.58%	-13.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.31%	-14.76%	-34.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.27%	-44.95%	-5.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.70%	-16.09%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	3.41%	+1.79%

Volatility

KBWB vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBWB	IAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	5.62%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.89%	10.66%	+5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	15.18%	+5.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.55%	18.06%	+8.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.12%	20.87%	+8.25%

KBWB vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBWB vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than IAK's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF	2.58%	1.69%	1.49%	1.44%	1.69%	2.26%	2.07%	1.84%	2.33%	1.62%	1.68%	1.62%
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	1.97%	2.04%	2.46%	3.20%	3.05%	2.13%	2.62%	2.38%	2.54%	1.35%	1.53%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBWB and IAK in my portfolio?

KBWB and IAK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBWB or IAK?

KBWB has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to IAK (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs IAK's -77.38%.

Which ETF is better, KBWB or IAK?

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 14.07% vs 13.20% for IAK. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBWB or IAK?

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 14.07% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBWB or IAK?

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IAK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBWB or IAK?

IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.97% for KBWB.

What is the main difference between KBWB and IAK?

KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.38% for IAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.