FTXO vs. XLF
FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - FTXO tracks the NASDAQ US Banks Index while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXO returned 8.64%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for XLF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTXO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
FTXO vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -1.10% return.
FTXO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 32.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
XLF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
FTXO vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 8.60% | 21.32% | 29.05% | 0.05% | -17.93% | 40.53% | -12.53% | 30.11% | -21.79% | 14.25% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -1.10% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXO and XLF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FTXO and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTXO vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXO
XLF
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FTXO
XLF
Technology
FTXO
XLF
Basic Materials
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Communication Services
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Energy
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Healthcare
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Industrials
FTXO
-
XLF
Real Estate
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Utilities
FTXO
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXO vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
FTXO
XLF
FTXO vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.11 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.59 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 1.50 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXO vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -82.69% | +27.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -14.79% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.84% | -15.54% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | -25.81% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -3.96% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -20.00% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 5.78% | +0.25% |
Volatility
FTXO vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.12%. This indicates that FTXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 4.12% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | 11.27% | +4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 14.64% | +6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 18.58% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 22.18% | +7.76% |
FTXO vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXO vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than XLF's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 1.65% | 1.92% | 2.18% | 3.20% | 2.94% | 1.64% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 3.51% | 1.09% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.82% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXO and XLF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXO has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to XLF (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXO dropped -55.26% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 5-year performance, XLF leads with 10.20% vs 8.64% for FTXO. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLF has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXO.
XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.65% for FTXO.
FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.08% for XLF.
FTXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXO and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer