FTXO vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Banks Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXO returned 8.55%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

FTXO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.48% return.

FTXO

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 8.55%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: 31.66%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	9.98%	21.32%	29.05%	0.05%	-17.93%	40.53%	27.95%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.48%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXO and QQQM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.43

The correlation between FTXO and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTXO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTXO	QQQM
Financial Services	100.0%	0.2%
Technology	0.4%	58.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

FTXO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXO

FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 42
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTXO	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.97	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.58	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.35	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	2.94	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	10.88	-5.62

FTXO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTXO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTXO	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.26%	-35.04%	-20.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.69%	-11.96%	-4.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.84%	-22.70%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.55%	-35.04%	-11.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.24%	+4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-8.20%	-7.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	3.22%	+2.81%

Volatility

FTXO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) is 5.88%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that FTXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTXO	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	9.00%	-3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.78%	14.43%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	17.85%	+3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.91%	22.53%	+4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.94%	22.30%	+7.64%

FTXO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	1.63%	1.92%	2.18%	3.20%	2.94%	1.64%	2.74%	2.53%	3.51%	1.09%	0.16%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTXO and QQQM in my portfolio?

FTXO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTXO or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to FTXO (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXO dropped -55.26% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, FTXO or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.11% vs 8.55% for FTXO. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTXO has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTXO or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTXO or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTXO or QQQM?

FTXO has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between FTXO and QQQM?

FTXO is categorized as Financials Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.