KBAB vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KBAB (KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. KBAB is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Over the past year, KBAB returned -12.41% vs 171.19% for NRGU. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBAB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

KBAB vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -34.51% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 125.94% return.

KBAB

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -11.65%
• YTD: -34.51%
• 6M: -43.88%
• 1Y: -12.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 125.94%
• 6M: 93.16%
• 1Y: 171.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBAB vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-34.51%	-7.77%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	125.94%	-14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and NRGU is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025	0.08

KBAB vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBAB	NRGU
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBAB vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB

KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 9
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 12
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 64
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBAB	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	2.31	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	2.55	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.32	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	4.31	-4.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	10.74	-11.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBAB vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBAB	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	2.31	-2.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	0.43	-0.80

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -65.23%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBAB	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.23%	-57.50%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.23%	-39.95%	-25.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.11%	-22.07%	-41.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.47%	-25.41%	-12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.68%	16.01%	+20.67%

Volatility

KBAB vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) is 28.64%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 31.62%. This indicates that KBAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBAB	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.64%	31.62%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.46%	61.19%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.67%	75.02%	+12.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.88%	89.03%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.88%	89.03%	+1.85%

KBAB vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBAB vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 91.44%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	91.44%	59.88%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBAB and NRGU in my portfolio?

KBAB and NRGU have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBAB or NRGU?

NRGU has higher volatility (31.62%) compared to KBAB (28.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -65.23% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, KBAB or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 171.19% vs -12.41% for KBAB. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KBAB has been the lower-risk option at 28.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBAB or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 171.19% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBAB or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBAB or NRGU?

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 91.44%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between KBAB and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.