PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KPRO vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KPRO and KLIP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

KPRO vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.58%
7.23%
KPRO
KLIP

Key characteristics

Sortino Ratio

KPRO:

3.32

KLIP:

1.49

Omega Ratio

KPRO:

1.40

KLIP:

1.20

Ulcer Index

KPRO:

1.35%

KLIP:

4.17%

Daily Std Dev

KPRO:

7.26%

KLIP:

15.41%

Max Drawdown

KPRO:

-3.77%

KLIP:

-10.39%

Current Drawdown

KPRO:

-0.29%

KLIP:

-0.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's 4.21% return.


KPRO

YTD

1.81%

1M

3.50%

6M

8.58%

1Y

13.73%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

KLIP

YTD

4.21%

1M

9.27%

6M

7.23%

1Y

13.93%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KPRO vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KPRO and KLIP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
Expense ratio chart for KPRO: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KPRO vs. KLIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KPRO

KLIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLIP is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLIP is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLIP is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLIP is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KPRO vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
The chart of Sortino ratio for KPRO, currently valued at 3.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.321.49
The chart of Omega ratio for KPRO, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.401.20
KPRO
KLIP


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

KPRO vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than KLIP's 50.53% yield.


TTM20242023
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
3.63%3.69%0.00%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
50.53%54.85%61.22%

Drawdowns

KPRO vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -3.77%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.29%
-0.21%
KPRO
KLIP

Volatility

KPRO vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is 1.82%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that KPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.82%
3.61%
KPRO
KLIP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab