PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KPRO vs. KLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KPRO vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KPRO vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.


KPRO

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-9.99%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KLIP

1D
2.10%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-8.98%
6M
-12.63%
1Y
-1.25%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KPRO vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KPRO and KLIP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

KPRO vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KPRO
KPRO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KPRO vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KPROKLIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

-0.06

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.00

0.05

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.01

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.08

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.09

-0.26

+0.18

KPRO vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KPRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KPRO and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KPROKLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-0.06

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.35

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between KPRO and KLIP is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KPRO vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than KLIP's 28.24% yield.


Drawdowns

KPRO vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and KLIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KPROKLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-18.61%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-17.23%

+6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.43%

-14.21%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-3.34%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

5.18%

-1.09%

Volatility

KPRO vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is 2.26%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that KPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KPROKLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

7.16%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

13.48%

-5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

19.76%

-11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.84%

18.19%

-10.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.84%

18.19%

-10.35%