KPRO vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KPRO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. KPRO is actively managed, while KWEB is passively managed. Over the past year, KPRO returned -4.43% vs -22.79% for KWEB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KPRO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

KPRO vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -6.19% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -28.08% return.

KPRO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: -6.19%
• 6M: -11.82%
• 1Y: -4.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -8.99%
• YTD: -28.08%
• 6M: -29.18%
• 1Y: -22.79%
• 3Y*: 0.71%
• 5Y*: -15.81%
• 10Y*: -0.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KPRO vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-6.19%	7.79%	11.98%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-28.08%	23.55%	23.85%

Correlation

The correlation between KPRO and KWEB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.88

The correlation between KPRO and KWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KPRO vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KPRO

KPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5
KPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 3
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KPRO vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KPRO	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	-0.84	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	-1.15	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.87	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	-0.58	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	-1.22	+0.55

KPRO vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KPRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KPRO and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KPRO vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -12.91%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KPRO	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.91%	-80.92%	+68.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.91%	-39.49%	+26.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.91%	-71.68%	+58.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-35.36%	+32.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	18.70%	-12.07%

Volatility

KPRO vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is 1.52%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that KPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KPRO	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	8.34%	-6.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.82%	20.47%	-12.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.86%	27.17%	-18.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.77%	47.70%	-39.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.77%	40.00%	-32.23%

KPRO vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KPRO vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than KWEB's 8.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	2.83%	2.65%	3.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	8.56%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KPRO and KWEB in my portfolio?

KPRO and KWEB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KPRO or KWEB?

KWEB has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to KPRO (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPRO dropped -12.91% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, KPRO or KWEB?

On 1-year performance, KPRO leads with -4.43% vs -22.79% for KWEB. On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KPRO or KWEB?

Over the 1-year period, KPRO has performed better with a -4.43% return vs -22.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KPRO or KWEB?

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KPRO or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 2.83% for KPRO.

What is the main difference between KPRO and KWEB?

KPRO is categorized as Options Trading, while KWEB is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KPRO and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.