KBAB vs. KHYB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

KBAB (KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and KHYB (KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBAB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KHYB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. KBAB is actively managed, while KHYB is passively managed. Over the past year, KBAB returned -20.25% vs 10.22% for KHYB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBAB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KHYB.

Performance

KBAB vs. KHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -39.92% return, which is significantly lower than KHYB's 2.14% return.

KBAB

• 1D: -8.26%
• 1M: -28.84%
• YTD: -39.92%
• 6M: -49.06%
• 1Y: -20.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KHYB

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 10.22%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBAB vs. KHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-39.92%	-7.77%
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF	2.14%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and KHYB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025	0.26

KBAB vs. KHYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBAB	KHYB
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	100.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBAB vs. KHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB

KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 8
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 10
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7

KHYB

KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 80
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. KHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBAB	KHYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	3.00	-3.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	4.61	-4.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.68	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	2.59	-2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	11.61	-12.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBAB vs. KHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the KHYB Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and KHYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBAB	KHYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	3.00	-3.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	0.27	-0.69

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. KHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -66.16%, which is greater than KHYB's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and KHYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBAB	KHYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.16%	-33.63%	-32.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.16%	-3.97%	-62.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.16%	-0.97%	-65.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.56%	-9.70%	-27.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.92%	0.88%	+36.04%

Volatility

KBAB vs. KHYB - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 25.89% compared to KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) at 0.86%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBAB	KHYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.89%	0.86%	+25.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.95%	3.05%	+54.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.74%	3.43%	+84.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.03%	6.32%	+84.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.03%	5.71%	+85.32%

KBAB vs. KHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KHYB's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBAB vs. KHYB - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 99.67%, more than KHYB's 8.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	99.67%	59.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF	8.16%	7.59%	10.11%	15.55%	9.67%	6.22%	4.76%	4.86%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBAB and KHYB in my portfolio?

KBAB and KHYB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBAB or KHYB?

KBAB has higher volatility (25.89%) compared to KHYB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -66.16% vs KHYB's -33.63%.

Which ETF is better, KBAB or KHYB?

On 1-year performance, KHYB leads with 10.22% vs -20.25% for KBAB. On fees, KHYB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBAB or KHYB?

Over the 1-year period, KHYB has performed better with a 10.22% return vs -20.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBAB or KHYB?

KHYB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBAB or KHYB?

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 99.67%, compared with 8.16% for KHYB.

What is the main difference between KBAB and KHYB?

KBAB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KHYB is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.69% for KHYB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.