KHYB vs. GAIN
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN).
KHYB is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. It was launched on Jun 26, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KHYB or GAIN.
Performance
KHYB vs. GAIN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than GAIN's 7.61% return.
KHYB
12.10%
0.13%
5.93%
15.23%
-0.88%
N/A
GAIN
7.61%
-3.11%
5.28%
10.53%
11.12%
17.83%
Key characteristics
KHYB | GAIN | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 4.51 | 0.56 |
Sortino Ratio | 6.79 | 0.88 |
Omega Ratio | 2.10 | 1.11 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 0.83 |
Martin Ratio | 49.15 | 2.11 |
Ulcer Index | 0.32% | 4.99% |
Daily Std Dev | 3.49% | 18.71% |
Max Drawdown | -33.01% | -80.87% |
Current Drawdown | -9.64% | -3.11% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between KHYB and GAIN is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KHYB vs. GAIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KHYB vs. GAIN - Dividend Comparison
KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.47%, less than GAIN's 18.54% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 15.47% | 15.56% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 6.87% | 4.93% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Gladstone Investment Corporation | 18.54% | 17.24% | 9.88% | 6.06% | 9.22% | 7.74% | 9.88% | 7.94% | 8.87% | 9.68% | 11.00% | 8.44% |
Drawdowns
KHYB vs. GAIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, smaller than the maximum GAIN drawdown of -80.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and GAIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KHYB vs. GAIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) is 0.67%, while Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that KHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.