KHYB vs. GAIN
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN).
KHYB is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. It was launched on Jun 26, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KHYB or GAIN.
Key characteristics
KHYB | GAIN | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 9.35% | -0.51% |
1Y Return | 15.33% | 19.00% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -3.02% | 9.07% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -1.12% | 11.62% |
Sharpe Ratio | 4.13 | 0.98 |
Daily Std Dev | 3.79% | 19.33% |
Max Drawdown | -33.01% | -80.87% |
Current Drawdown | -11.86% | -5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between KHYB and GAIN is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KHYB vs. GAIN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than GAIN's -0.51% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KHYB vs. GAIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KHYB vs. GAIN - Dividend Comparison
KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, more than GAIN's 14.40% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 15.29% | 15.56% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 6.87% | 4.93% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Gladstone Investment Corporation | 14.40% | 16.57% | 9.08% | 5.34% | 9.22% | 7.42% | 9.68% | 7.77% | 8.87% | 9.68% | 11.00% | 7.30% |
Drawdowns
KHYB vs. GAIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, smaller than the maximum GAIN drawdown of -80.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and GAIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KHYB vs. GAIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) is 1.26%, while Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that KHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.