KARS vs. RBIL
KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KARS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KARS returned 59.12% vs 4.01% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
KARS vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.37% return.
KARS
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 59.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- -3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KARS vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 10.15% | 38.25% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.37% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between KARS and RBIL is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KARS vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
KARS
RBIL
KARS vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KARS | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 2.13 | -0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 7.95 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.57 | 48.27 | -34.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KARS vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KARS | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.85% | -0.52% | -64.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.68% | -0.52% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.86% | -0.46% | -32.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.33% | -0.07% | -28.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 0.09% | +4.25% |
Volatility
KARS vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KARS | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 0.36% | +10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.86% | 0.85% | +20.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.46% | 0.95% | +26.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 1.07% | +28.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 1.07% | +28.32% |
KARS vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
KARS vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KARS and RBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KARS has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, KARS leads with 59.12% vs 4.01% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KARS has performed better with a 59.12% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.17% for KARS.
KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.36 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KARS and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer