K.TO vs. GFI
K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, K.TO returned 19.71%/yr vs 28.54%/yr for GFI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
K.TO vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
K.TO is traded in CAD, while GFI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 19.71%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 28.54% annualized return.
K.TO
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 6M
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- 67.56%
- 3Y*
- 79.11%
- 5Y*
- 32.58%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -15.64%
- YTD
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -12.40%
- 1Y
- 51.74%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 35.90%
- 10Y*
- 28.54%
K.TO vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -7.26% | 191.80% | 69.08% | 49.14% | -22.75% | -20.24% | 52.79% | 40.00% | -18.82% | 29.36% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -12.22% | 224.88% | 1.67% | 41.45% | 3.56% | 23.27% | 39.63% | 81.66% | -9.75% | 35.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and GFI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.65 |
The correlation between K.TO and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
K.TO:
CA$43.06B
GFI:
$32.65B
K.TO:
$2.36
GFI:
$5.39
K.TO:
10.83
GFI:
6.78
K.TO:
0.14
GFI:
0.11
K.TO:
3.90
GFI:
2.34
K.TO:
3.39
GFI:
3.87
K.TO:
$7.97B
GFI:
$13.98B
K.TO:
$4.26B
GFI:
$7.34B
K.TO:
$5.03B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K.TO vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
K.TO
GFI
K.TO vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K.TO | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.27 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 3.34 | +2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -84.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K.TO | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -84.25% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.29% | -42.41% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.29% | -42.41% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.26% | -53.92% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.36% | -62.96% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.94% | -37.22% | +6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.98% | -40.22% | -15.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 16.13% | -3.84% |
Volatility
K.TO vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 18.19% and 17.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K.TO | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.19% | 17.88% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.35% | 46.33% | -6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.98% | 59.83% | -8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 52.85% | -10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.61% | 55.28% | -9.67% |
Dividends
K.TO vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
K.TO vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
K.TO vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
K.TO and GFI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K.TO and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer