JVAL vs. JMOM
JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JVAL returned 12.29%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for JMOM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
JVAL vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.
JVAL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
JVAL vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.44% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and JMOM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JVAL and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
JVAL vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JVAL
JMOM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
JVAL
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
JVAL
JMOM
Financial Services
JVAL
JMOM
Healthcare
JVAL
JMOM
Industrials
JVAL
JMOM
Communication Services
JVAL
JMOM
Energy
JVAL
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
JVAL
JMOM
Real Estate
JVAL
JMOM
Basic Materials
JVAL
JMOM
Utilities
JVAL
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVAL vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
JVAL
JMOM
JVAL vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JVAL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.45 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 4.69 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.70 | 22.24 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JVAL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.58 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.88 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.82 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVAL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -34.31% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -7.87% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -19.51% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -28.26% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.17% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -6.32% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.66% | +0.48% |
Volatility
JVAL vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is 4.02%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that JVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVAL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.62% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 11.55% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 14.32% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 18.65% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 20.13% | -0.31% |
JVAL vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JVAL and JMOM have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JVAL vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JVAL and JMOM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to JVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 12.29% for JVAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, JVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL and JMOM have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
JVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
JVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JMOM is Momentum. JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index.
JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVAL and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer