PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVAL vs. RFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVAL vs. RFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 13.04% return.


JVAL

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.75%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.72%
1Y
39.93%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*

RFV

1D
-0.36%
1M
3.75%
YTD
13.04%
6M
10.71%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVAL vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.44%16.16%14.53%19.48%-11.58%31.31%6.43%28.37%-8.94%5.24%
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
13.04%7.66%5.63%30.26%-3.99%33.02%9.61%24.98%-18.56%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JVAL and RFV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.85

The correlation between JVAL and RFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JVAL vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JVAL
RFV

Technology

39.2%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
24.4%

Financial Services

9.3%
17.5%

Healthcare

8.2%
0.7%

Industrials

7.4%
11.4%

Communication Services

6.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
9.1%

Real Estate

2.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
7.6%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Technology

JVAL
39.2%
RFV
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JVAL
10.5%
RFV
24.4%

Financial Services

JVAL
9.3%
RFV
17.5%

Healthcare

JVAL
8.2%
RFV
0.7%

Industrials

JVAL
7.4%
RFV
11.4%

Communication Services

JVAL
6.9%
RFV

-

Energy

JVAL
3.5%
RFV
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

JVAL
3.1%
RFV
9.1%

Real Estate

JVAL
2.6%
RFV
3.5%

Basic Materials

JVAL
2.1%
RFV
7.6%

Utilities

JVAL
2.1%
RFV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVAL vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVAL
JVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RFV
RFV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVAL vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVALRFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

2.01

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.70

5.94

+12.76

JVAL vs. RFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVAL and RFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVALRFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

1.39

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.46

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.38

+0.29

Drawdowns

JVAL vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and RFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVALRFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-71.82%

+31.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-12.51%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-24.65%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-24.65%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.36%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-9.79%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

4.23%

-2.09%

Volatility

JVAL vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is 4.02%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that JVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVALRFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.60%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

11.86%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

18.13%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

22.08%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

24.99%

-5.17%

JVAL vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVAL vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison

JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than RFV's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.72%2.08%2.21%2.43%2.46%1.88%2.55%2.58%2.61%0.45%0.00%0.00%
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
1.84%2.07%1.31%1.27%2.05%1.60%1.52%1.71%1.39%1.36%0.88%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


JVAL and RFV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to JVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs RFV's -71.82%.

On 5-year performance, JVAL leads with 12.29% vs 10.00% for RFV. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFV.

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.

JVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.35% for RFV.

JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVAL and RFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer