JVAL vs. RFV
JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JVAL returned 12.29%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for RFV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RFV.
Performance
JVAL vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 13.04% return.
JVAL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
RFV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
JVAL vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.44% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 13.04% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and RFV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JVAL and RFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
JVAL vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JVAL
RFV
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
JVAL
RFV
Consumer Cyclical
JVAL
RFV
Financial Services
JVAL
RFV
Healthcare
JVAL
RFV
Industrials
JVAL
RFV
Communication Services
JVAL
RFV
-
Energy
JVAL
RFV
Consumer Defensive
JVAL
RFV
Real Estate
JVAL
RFV
Basic Materials
JVAL
RFV
Utilities
JVAL
RFV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVAL vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank
JVAL
RFV
JVAL vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JVAL | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.25 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 2.01 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.70 | 5.94 | +12.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JVAL | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 1.39 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.38 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and RFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVAL | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -71.82% | +31.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -12.51% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -24.65% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -24.65% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.36% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -9.79% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 4.23% | -2.09% |
Volatility
JVAL vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is 4.02%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that JVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVAL | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.60% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 11.86% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 18.13% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 22.08% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 24.99% | -5.17% |
JVAL vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JVAL vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than RFV's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JVAL and RFV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to JVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs RFV's -71.82%.
On 5-year performance, JVAL leads with 12.29% vs 10.00% for RFV. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFV.
RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.
JVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.35% for RFV.
JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVAL and RFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer