JVAL vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
JVAL and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JVAL is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both JVAL and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JVAL or RFV.
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and RFV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JVAL vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JVAL:
1.28
RFV:
0.34
JVAL:
1.79
RFV:
0.60
JVAL:
1.23
RFV:
1.07
JVAL:
2.18
RFV:
0.67
JVAL:
7.44
RFV:
1.42
JVAL:
2.25%
RFV:
4.38%
JVAL:
13.11%
RFV:
18.46%
JVAL:
-40.42%
RFV:
-71.82%
JVAL:
-4.66%
RFV:
-8.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 4.11% return.
JVAL
14.78%
-1.39%
7.44%
15.47%
11.13%
N/A
RFV
4.11%
-3.44%
7.93%
4.66%
13.49%
9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JVAL vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JVAL vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JVAL vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than RFV's 0.98% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.51% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JVAL vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is 4.39%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that JVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.