PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVAL vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVAL vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.18% return.


JVAL

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.75%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.72%
1Y
39.93%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*

GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVAL vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.44%16.16%14.53%19.48%-11.58%31.31%6.43%28.37%-8.94%5.24%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JVAL and GCOW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between JVAL and GCOW has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JVAL vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JVAL
GCOW

Technology

39.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
4.6%

Financial Services

9.3%

-

Healthcare

8.2%
14.6%

Industrials

7.4%
12.4%

Communication Services

6.9%
14.6%

Energy

3.5%
24.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
17.1%

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%
7.3%

Utilities

2.1%
4.1%

Technology

JVAL
39.2%
GCOW
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JVAL
10.5%
GCOW
4.6%

Financial Services

JVAL
9.3%
GCOW

-

Healthcare

JVAL
8.2%
GCOW
14.6%

Industrials

JVAL
7.4%
GCOW
12.4%

Communication Services

JVAL
6.9%
GCOW
14.6%

Energy

JVAL
3.5%
GCOW
24.4%

Consumer Defensive

JVAL
3.1%
GCOW
17.1%

Real Estate

JVAL
2.6%
GCOW

-

Basic Materials

JVAL
2.1%
GCOW
7.3%

Utilities

JVAL
2.1%
GCOW
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVAL vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVAL
JVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVAL vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVALGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

5.71

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.70

15.05

+3.65

JVAL vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVAL and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVALGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.52

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.92

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.59

+0.08

Drawdowns

JVAL vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVALGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-37.64%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-4.77%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-12.35%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-21.48%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.73%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-5.84%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.81%

+0.33%

Volatility

JVAL vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVALGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

2.85%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.99%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

10.81%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

13.49%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

16.20%

+3.62%

JVAL vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVAL vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.72%2.08%2.21%2.43%2.46%1.88%2.55%2.58%2.61%0.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JVAL and GCOW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JVAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs 12.29% for JVAL. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.

JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.60% for GCOW.

JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVAL and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer