PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVAL vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVAL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return.


JVAL

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.75%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.72%
1Y
39.93%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVAL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.44%16.16%14.53%19.48%-11.58%31.31%6.43%28.37%-8.94%5.24%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JVAL and FDL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between JVAL and FDL has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JVAL vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JVAL
FDL

Technology

39.2%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
3.8%

Financial Services

9.3%
15.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
16.8%

Industrials

7.4%
3.8%

Communication Services

6.9%
10.6%

Energy

3.5%
27.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
14.7%

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%
0.3%

Utilities

2.1%
6.5%

Technology

JVAL
39.2%
FDL
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JVAL
10.5%
FDL
3.8%

Financial Services

JVAL
9.3%
FDL
15.1%

Healthcare

JVAL
8.2%
FDL
16.8%

Industrials

JVAL
7.4%
FDL
3.8%

Communication Services

JVAL
6.9%
FDL
10.6%

Energy

JVAL
3.5%
FDL
27.3%

Consumer Defensive

JVAL
3.1%
FDL
14.7%

Real Estate

JVAL
2.6%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

JVAL
2.1%
FDL
0.3%

Utilities

JVAL
2.1%
FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVAL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVAL
JVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVAL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVALFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

5.56

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.70

13.56

+5.14

JVAL vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVAL and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVALFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.11

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.88

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.45

+0.22

Drawdowns

JVAL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVALFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-65.93%

+25.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-4.27%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-12.24%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-16.46%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.18%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-9.66%

+4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.75%

+0.39%

Volatility

JVAL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVALFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

2.85%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.87%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

11.28%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

14.31%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

17.11%

+2.71%

JVAL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVAL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.72%2.08%2.21%2.43%2.46%1.88%2.55%2.58%2.61%0.45%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JVAL and FDL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JVAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 12.29% for JVAL. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.

JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.45% for FDL.

JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVAL and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer